6smarketersSoftware
Home/Finance, Legal & Operations/Contract Management (CLM)/Juro

Juro

Contract Management (CLM)

Visit websiteCompare
★★★★☆ 4.8 / 5 on G2 · 4.7 on Capterra (200+ G2 reviews)
4.8 / 5
G2 rating [source]
2016
Founded [source]
Browser
Native [source]
Collaborative
And AI [source]

Quick facts

CategoryModern collaborative CLM
Founded2016
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom
Starts atCustom quote
Best forModern collaborative contracts
DeploymentCloud, browser native
Free planNo
IntegrationsCRM, e-signature, systems
G2 rating4.8 / 5
Capterra rating4.7 / 5

What is Juro?

Juro is a modern, browser native contract platform with a collaborative editor and AI, highly rated for making contract creation and management fast and easy for whole teams. Founded in 2016, it rethinks contracting around a browser based, collaborative editor where legal and business teams create, negotiate, approve, sign and store contracts in one flexible workspace, with AI that drafts, reviews and summarises, rather than wrestling with Word documents and email. Designed for speed and collaboration across the whole team, Juro makes contracting accessible to business users while keeping legal in control, which has driven very high ratings. For modern, collaborative contracting, Juro is a leading choice.

Juro's distinction is its modern, browser native, collaborative approach to the whole contract lifecycle. Rather than document centric, legacy CLM, it centres on a flexible, collaborative editor in the browser where contracts are created, negotiated and managed by the whole team, with AI assistance, which makes contracting fast and easy and drives adoption beyond legal. That modern, collaborative, AI enhanced experience sets it apart and earns top ratings.

Juro at a glanceJuro is a modern, browser native contract platform with a collaborative editor and AI [Juro]. It holds about a 4.8 out of 5 rating on G2 and 4.7 on Capterra, highly rated for fast, easy contracting across teams.

Who Juro is best for

Juro is best for growing and mid market companies, and modern legal teams, that want fast, collaborative, browser native contracting accessible to the whole team, with AI, rather than document centric legacy CLM. It suits teams prioritising speed, collaboration and experience. It is a weaker fit for the most complex, highly customised enterprise contracting at scale, where Icertis fits, or those wanting simple document and signing only, where PandaDoc fits.

Key features

The core strengths are a browser native, collaborative contract editor, full lifecycle, creation, negotiation, approval, e-signature and storage, and AI for drafting, review and summarisation. Juro offers templates, self service contracting for business teams, a searchable repository, and integrations with CRM, e-signature and systems. Its modern, collaborative, browser native experience with AI, making contracting fast and team wide, is its defining advantage.

Juro pricing

Juro uses custom pricing with no public figures, based on users, contract volume and features, requiring a quote, as is typical for CLM. There is no free tier; it targets growing and mid market companies and legal teams. Because pricing scales with scope, model your users and contract volume. Get a quote via the Juro site.

Integrations and ecosystem

Juro integrates with CRM like Salesforce and HubSpot, e-signature, and other business systems, so contracting connects to sales and the wider business, supporting self service contracting. Its integrations let business teams generate and manage contracts from the tools they use, within legal guardrails, central to its collaborative, team wide contracting approach.

Juro and collaboration

Browser native collaboration is Juro's signature: contracts live in a flexible, collaborative editor in the browser where legal and business teams create, negotiate and manage them together in real time, with AI assistance, rather than passing Word documents by email. For teams that want fast, collaborative contracting accessible beyond legal, this modern editor and collaboration are the main reasons to choose Juro.

Ease of use and support

Juro is praised for a modern, easy, collaborative experience that whole teams adopt quickly, with strong support, driving its very high ratings. Its G2 reviews highlight the collaborative editor, ease of use and AI, with its modern mid market focus rather than the heaviest enterprise customisation the main consideration.

Is Juro worth it?

For growing and mid market companies and modern legal teams that want fast, collaborative, browser native contracting accessible to the whole team with AI, Juro is an outstanding, top rated choice. The main caution is that the most complex, customised enterprise contracting suits Icertis, and simple document and signing only PandaDoc, but for modern, collaborative contracting Juro excels.

Pricing

Juro

Custom
quote
  • Collaborative editor
  • Full lifecycle
  • AI assistance

Scale / Enterprise

Custom
quote
  • Advanced AI
  • More integrations
  • Scale and support

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Modern, browser native editor
  • Collaborative across whole team
  • AI drafting and review
  • Fast, easy contracting
  • Among the highest ratings

Cons

  • Custom pricing, no free tier
  • Not heaviest enterprise customisation
  • Mid market focus
  • Scales with users and volume

Juro alternatives

These contract management tools come up most often against Juro.

Juro FAQ

What is Juro used for?
Juro is used for modern contract management: creating, negotiating, approving, signing and storing contracts in a browser native, collaborative editor, with AI for drafting, review and summarisation, accessible to legal and business teams.
How much does Juro cost?
Juro uses custom pricing based on users, contract volume and features, with no public figures or free tier, targeting growing and mid market companies and legal teams. Contact Juro for a quote via the Juro site.
What makes Juro different?
Juro is browser native and collaborative, centring contracting on a flexible editor where whole teams create and manage contracts together in real time with AI, rather than document centric legacy CLM, which makes contracting fast and team wide.
Juro vs Ironclad, which is better?
Juro is modern, browser native and collaborative with top ratings for growing and mid market teams, while Ironclad has stronger workflow automation across mid market and enterprise. Juro suits collaborative, modern contracting; Ironclad suits workflow driven CLM.
Does Juro use AI?
Yes. Juro uses AI to draft, review and summarise contracts within its collaborative editor, speeding contracting and making it easier for legal and business teams, as part of its modern approach.
Is Juro good for legal teams?
Yes. Juro suits modern legal teams and the business teams they serve, with a collaborative, browser native editor and AI that keep legal in control while making contracting accessible and fast across the whole team.

External links