6smarketersSoftware
Home/HR & People/Applicant Tracking System (ATS)/Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Applicant Tracking System (ATS)

Visit websiteCompare
★★★★☆ 4.4 / 5 on G2 · 4.5 on Capterra (3,975 G2 reviews)
4.4 / 5
G2 rating, 3.9k reviews [source]
2012
Founded [source]
Structured
Hiring approach [source]
Mid-ent
Target customer [source]

Quick facts

CategoryApplicant tracking system
Founded2012
HeadquartersNew York City
Starts atCustom quote
Best forStructured hiring
DeploymentCloud
Free planNo
Integrations450+ integrations
G2 rating4.4 / 5
Capterra rating4.5 / 5

What is Greenhouse?

Greenhouse is a leading applicant tracking system built around structured, data driven hiring. Founded in 2012, it helps recruiting teams run consistent, fair and effective hiring processes, with customisable pipelines, interview scorecards, structured interview kits, powerful automation and deep reporting. Rather than just tracking candidates, Greenhouse encourages a disciplined approach, defining what good looks like for each role, standardising interviews, and measuring outcomes, which improves hiring quality and reduces bias. For mid market and enterprise teams serious about hiring well, Greenhouse is a benchmark platform.

Greenhouse's distinction is its structured hiring philosophy combined with strong customisation and integrations. It is highly configurable, with 450+ integrations and robust automation and reporting, and it bakes best practices for consistent, data driven hiring into the workflow. That combination of discipline, flexibility and depth, with nearly 4,000 reviews, makes it a top choice for organisations that treat hiring as a core capability.

Greenhouse at a glanceGreenhouse is a leading ATS built around structured, data driven hiring [Greenhouse]. It holds a 4.4 out of 5 rating across nearly 4,000 reviews on G2 and 4.5 on Capterra, favoured by mid market and enterprise teams.

Who Greenhouse is best for

Greenhouse is best for mid market and enterprise organisations that want structured, data driven, high quality hiring, with the customisation and reporting to match. It suits teams that treat recruiting as a core capability. It is a weaker fit for very small businesses wanting the cheapest or simplest tool, where JazzHR or Workable fit, or teams prioritising pure ease of use over structure, where Lever may appeal more.

Key features

The core strengths are structured hiring with interview kits and scorecards, highly customisable pipelines and workflows, powerful automation, and deep reporting and analytics. Greenhouse offers job posting, a candidate database, collaboration tools, and 450+ integrations across the HR and recruiting stack. Its structured hiring approach, customisation depth and analytics are its defining advantages for serious hiring teams.

Greenhouse pricing

Greenhouse uses custom pricing with no public figures, typically based on company size and the tier of features, and requires contacting sales for a quote. There is no free tier; it targets mid market and enterprise buyers and is described as an investment that delivers strong value. Because pricing scales with size, model your headcount and needed tier. Get a quote via the Greenhouse pricing page.

Integrations and ecosystem

Greenhouse offers more than 450 integrations across HRIS, sourcing, assessments, background checks, scheduling and other recruiting tools, one of the broadest ecosystems in the category. This breadth lets teams build a complete hiring stack around Greenhouse, connecting it to the tools they use before and after the ATS, which is a key strength for mid market and enterprise buyers.

Greenhouse and structured hiring

Structured hiring is Greenhouse's signature: defining role requirements, standardising interviews with kits and scorecards, and measuring outcomes, which improves consistency, quality and fairness while reducing bias. For organisations that want to hire deliberately and improve over time with data, this disciplined approach, built into the product, is the main reason to choose Greenhouse.

Ease of use and support

Greenhouse is powerful and customisable, which brings some complexity, but it is well regarded and supported, suiting teams willing to invest in good process. Its G2 reviews praise customisation, integrations and structured hiring, with the learning curve and cost versus simpler tools the main considerations.

Is Greenhouse worth it?

For mid market and enterprise organisations that want structured, data driven, high quality hiring with deep customisation and integrations, Greenhouse is one of the best choices and a category benchmark. The main caution is that very small businesses may find it more than they need and prefer JazzHR or Workable, and teams wanting pure simplicity may prefer Lever, but for serious hiring Greenhouse excels.

Pricing

Essential

Custom
quote
  • Core ATS
  • Structured hiring
  • Scorecards

Advanced

Custom
quote
  • Automation
  • More customisation
  • Reporting

Expert

Custom
quote
  • Advanced analytics
  • Enterprise features
  • Priority support

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Structured, data driven hiring
  • Highly customisable workflows
  • 450+ integrations
  • Strong automation and reporting
  • Trusted by mid market and enterprise

Cons

  • Custom pricing, no free tier
  • Learning curve from its depth
  • More than very small teams need
  • Investment level cost

Greenhouse alternatives

These applicant tracking system tools come up most often against Greenhouse.

Greenhouse FAQ

What is Greenhouse used for?
Greenhouse is used by recruiting teams to run structured, data driven hiring: posting jobs, tracking candidates through customisable pipelines, standardising interviews with scorecards and kits, collaborating, and reporting on hiring metrics.
How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse uses custom pricing based on company size and feature tier, with no public figures or free tier, and is described as an investment that delivers strong value. Contact sales via the Greenhouse pricing page.
Is Greenhouse good for enterprises?
Yes. Greenhouse is widely used in the mid market and enterprise, with the customisation, integrations, automation and structured hiring that larger organisations need to hire consistently and at quality.
Greenhouse vs Lever, which is better?
Greenhouse emphasises structured, data driven hiring with deep customisation, while Lever is known for ease of use and candidate nurturing. Greenhouse suits structured hiring; Lever suits teams prioritising usability.
What is structured hiring in Greenhouse?
Structured hiring means defining role requirements, standardising interviews with kits and scorecards, and measuring outcomes, which Greenhouse builds into its workflow to improve consistency, quality and fairness and reduce bias in hiring.
Does Greenhouse integrate with other tools?
Yes. Greenhouse offers more than 450 integrations across HRIS, sourcing, assessments, background checks and scheduling, one of the broadest ecosystems in the category, letting teams build a complete hiring stack around it.

External links