6smarketersSoftware
Home/AI & Emerging/AI Coding Assistants/Cursor

Cursor

AI Coding Assistants

Visit websiteCompare
★★★★☆ 4.6 / 5 on G2 · 4.7 on Capterra (322 G2 reviews)
4.6 / 5
G2 rating, 322 reviews [source]
AI first
Code editor [source]
Free
Pro ~$20/mo [source]
Codebase
Aware AI [source]

Quick facts

CategoryAI first code editor
VendorAnysphere
Starts atFree; Pro ~$20/mo
Best forAI first code editor
DeploymentDesktop editor
Free planYes
IntegrationsVS Code based, models
G2 rating4.6 / 5
Capterra rating4.7 / 5

What is Cursor?

Cursor is a popular AI first code editor (a VS Code fork) with deep, codebase aware AI, chat, edits and agents built in, suited to developers wanting AI at the centre of their editor and workflow. Built on VS Code (so familiar and compatible with its extensions), Cursor puts AI at the core, with codebase aware chat, inline and multi file edits, powerful autocomplete, and agent capabilities that make multi step changes across your project, using leading AI models. Rapidly popular with developers for making AI feel native to coding, Cursor is a leading AI first editor. For an AI first code editor, Cursor is a leading choice.

Cursor's distinction is being a familiar yet AI first editor with deep codebase awareness and agents. By building on VS Code and putting AI at the centre (codebase aware chat, multi file edits, agents), it makes AI feel native to coding while keeping a familiar editor, which bolt on assistants do not match for AI nativeness and codebase aware editing. That AI first design, codebase awareness and familiarity set it apart.

Cursor at a glanceCursor is a popular AI first code editor built on VS Code [Cursor]. It holds a 4.6 out of 5 rating across 322 reviews on G2 and 4.7 on Capterra, a leading AI first editor.

Who Cursor is best for

Cursor is best for developers and teams that want AI at the centre of their editor, with deep codebase aware chat, multi file edits and agents, in a familiar VS Code based environment. It suits an AI first code editor. It is a weaker fit for those wanting AI simply added to their existing editor without switching, where GitHub Copilot or JetBrains AI fit, terminal agentic coding, where Claude Code fits, strict on premises privacy, where Tabnine fits, or building apps from prompts, where Replit or Bolt fit.

Key features

The core strengths are an AI first editor built on VS Code (familiar, extension compatible), codebase aware chat, inline and multi file edits, powerful autocomplete, agent capabilities for multi step changes, and leading model choices. Cursor offers AI native, codebase aware coding. Its AI first design, codebase awareness and familiarity are its defining advantages.

Cursor pricing

Cursor has a free tier (Hobby), with Pro at around 20 US dollars a month (more usage, agents and capability) and Business and enterprise tiers for teams, and note heavy AI and agent usage can increase costs (some usage based elements). So most pay around 20 a month, with team tiers and attention to usage. Confirm details on the Cursor pricing page.

Integrations and ecosystem

Cursor is built on VS Code, so it is compatible with many VS Code extensions and workflows, and offers choice of leading AI models and codebase indexing. Its VS Code foundation and model choice, which keep it familiar and flexible while AI native, support its positioning as an AI first yet compatible editor.

Cursor and AI first design

Being a familiar yet AI first editor with deep codebase awareness and agents is the signature strength: Cursor builds on VS Code and puts AI at the centre (codebase aware chat, multi file edits, agents), making AI native to coding while familiar, which bolt on assistants do not match for AI nativeness and codebase aware editing. For an AI first editor, this is the main reason to choose Cursor.

Ease of use and support

Cursor is highly rated for native AI integration, codebase awareness, multi file edits, autocomplete and familiarity, loved by many developers, with good support, though reviewers note costs can escalate with heavy usage, AI output needs review (especially on complex codebases), and resource use on large projects. Its G2 reviews praise AI nativeness, with cost and review the main considerations.

Is Cursor worth it?

For developers and teams wanting AI at the centre of a familiar editor, with codebase aware chat, multi file edits and agents, Cursor is an excellent choice. The main caution is cost with heavy usage and reviewing AI output, so simply adding AI to your editor suits GitHub Copilot, terminal agentic coding Claude Code, strict privacy Tabnine, and build from prompt Replit, but for an AI first editor Cursor leads.

Pricing

Hobby (Free)

$0
per month
  • AI first editor
  • Limited usage
  • Trying it

Pro

$20
per month
  • More usage and agents
  • Full capability
  • Individuals

Business / Enterprise

Per user
by plan
  • Team features
  • Admin and privacy
  • Teams

Pros and cons

Pros

  • AI first, native integration
  • Codebase aware AI
  • Multi file edits and agents
  • Built on familiar VS Code
  • Leading model choices

Cons

  • Costs can escalate with heavy use
  • AI output needs review
  • Resource use on large projects
  • Means switching editors

Cursor alternatives

These ai coding assistants tools come up most often against Cursor.

Cursor FAQ

What is Cursor used for?
Cursor is used as an AI first code editor: built on VS Code, it puts AI at the centre with codebase aware chat, inline and multi file edits, powerful autocomplete and agents that make multi step changes, so developers code with AI native to their editor, grounded in their whole project.
How much does Cursor cost?
Cursor has a free tier (Hobby), with Pro at around 20 US dollars a month and Business and enterprise tiers for teams, though heavy AI and agent usage can increase costs. See the Cursor pricing page.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot, which is better?
Cursor is an AI first editor with deep, codebase aware AI and agents, while GitHub Copilot adds all round AI to your existing editor. Cursor suits those wanting AI at the centre of their editor; Copilot suits adding AI to your current workflow.
Is Cursor based on VS Code?
Yes. Cursor is built as a fork of VS Code, so it is familiar to VS Code users and compatible with many VS Code extensions and workflows, while adding deep, AI first capabilities (codebase aware chat, multi file edits, agents) at its core.
Is Cursor good for large codebases?
Cursor is designed to be codebase aware, indexing your project so its AI can reference your whole codebase for more relevant help, which is useful for larger projects, though reviewers note resource use and that AI output still needs review on complex codebases.
Does Cursor have an AI agent?
Yes. Cursor includes agent capabilities that take a goal and make multi step changes across your codebase, running and iterating, in addition to codebase aware chat, autocomplete and multi file edits, part of its AI first, agentic approach to coding.

External links